California Association of HERS Raters

CF1RThe California Association of HERS Raters (CalHERS) was a 501 6 (c) non profit mutual benefit corporation formed February 2008. It was created to provide advocacy and education for HERS Raters, California Consumers and other stakeholders that interact with California's Home Energy Rating System.October 2009 CalHERS slowly disbanded and lost its non-profit status. This site has been resurrected November 2011 for no other reason than to...read more

CalHERS-LinkedIn-Group


California Association of HERS Raters
Energy Upgrade California Industry Requests and Issues Resolution
Written by John Richau   
Thursday, 15 December 2011 07:12

 

On Monday, December 12th, Contractors and EUC program officials gathered to discuss some of the challenges of EUC for Contractors and Raters and some of the accomplishments. The room was filled to capacity and it followed the brainstorming sessions lead by Mindy, a consultant to EUC. Click here for issues resolution matrix.(pdf)

Last Updated on Thursday, 15 December 2011 07:26
 
Response to Stakeholder Memo 8/25/11
Written by John Richau   
Sunday, 04 December 2011 16:40

 

This is a response to Efficiency First' Concerns about HERS II

HERS II and the Home Performance Industry

California’s leadership and action for energy efficiency has been noticed globally. California has always set the standard for energy efficiency in the United States dating back to the vision of Art Rosenfeld in 1978. Since then, the state has stayed the course with standardized energy policy that is on par with stellar European energy efficiency standards.

The California Association of HERS Raters (CalHERS) supports the California Certified Energy Rating and Testing Service (CalCERTS) with some reservation.

As per the Memo sent to EUC Stakeholders on August 25, 2011, it appears that the HERS II program will be in review over the coming months and CalHERS looks forward to participating in this review as a group of significant stakeholders in this industry. The rating system will have a major impact on how CalHERS members plan their businesses. We believe that public comment and stakeholder involvement is a key prerequisite to moving the HERS II program forward to its pre-ordained conclusion.

Conditional Approval of CalCERTS HERS Building Performance Contractors curriculum

The building performance contractor path, as proposed, could create an elite legion of contractors hence increasing this path’s credibility and build upon the BPI national standard. Cross training Contractors and incorporating the HERS II certification (and related Title 24 knowledge) from CalCERTS will continue the trend toward a standardized and globally leading system that is better for California than national standards. Prerequisites for the training should be high such as 5 years as a working, licensed contractor.

We believe this approach builds upon the Commission’s substantial ARRA investments in the HERS industry. This would benefit many including California’s BPI contractors who have invested heavily in working within California’s system to achieve real, credible, and standardized energy savings by virtue of third party verification. The HERS II system has helped California consumers by offering unbiased, standardized methodologies of ensuring quality and performance.

In consideration of the August 25th memo on the future of HERS II, we believe that the commission should continue to invest in - and stay the course rolling out- a system that that has been in development for so many years.

Fast Track CHEERS Approval

CalHERS requests that the CEC use its resources to “fast track” CHEERS’ certification and make this a priority within the department. Doing this will foster competition and bring back a dynamic force in the HERS industry. The best interest of California will be served by rolling out the long-planned labeling system whose momentum has been increasing. CHEERS was far ahead of CalCerts in 2008 and losing them has handicapped the industry. A CHEER was well on its way transforming markets, consumer attitudes, and making inroads into the Real Estate industry.

Given the infrastructure that exists in the current HERS II system, we urge the Commission to move forward with HERS II implementation.

HERS II should take precedence over BPI

The HERS II certificate produces a score that is standardized and takes into account Time Dependent Valuation and the building dispassionately. TDV is the ultimate goal of California according to the CPUCs Strategic Plan and must be nurtured. Building new plants is costly. A standards based on DOE2 ensures objectivity is maintained and will populate our state’s growing and valuable HERS registry. Consumers should be educated to understand that the label has value at many stages of the building’s life including transfer. This standardized system, unique to California and it’s varied climates, has and will continue to enhance the HERS II program’s objectivity and credibility with consumers.

Consumers that know about the third party verification system demand it. This reaction is driven by having an agent ensure that their individual investments in energy efficiency improvement projects are done correctly. Consumer awareness of HERS Raters, however, is low. The HERS II system adds significant assurance of energy savings for the state and to consumers while offering a standardized Rating unique to their climate zone.

The economic climate in California calls for the nurturing and expansion of the third party verification system called HERS II. California must stay the course and examine the implications of adopting a “one size fits all” national standard. The Building Performance Contracting (BPC) industry should focus their attention on transforming the quality and skill of contractors and the shoddy work performed that HERS Raters witness on a daily basis throughout California. The greatest barrier to the success of individual BPCs has more to do with cut throat contractors than from HERS II. The many individuals that have invested their heart and soul in HERS II have created jobs, helped define the long-term program, and helped consumers get what they paid for.

The CEC’s rollout of HERS II started in 1999 with the establishment of the California Home Energy Rating Services and was the basis for Energy Efficiency Mortgages in California. In February 2008 CHEERS conducted the first modern HERS II class (5 days instead of 3 days) and these strides have proven effective. BPI is a relatively new standard that does not take into account California’s big bold plans.

The well-established path of HERS II has been a long-term investment for California and is well on its way to being embraced by industry and consumers. The ball is rolling for Green jobs creation for entry level workers into family wage jobs and the potential to transform the market is close at hand. Please consider getting CHEERS back online a priority and stay the course by approving CalCerts’ new training.

We thank the Commission for consideration of the HERS Industry, and hope that the HERS II path will be solidified and continue.

Sincerely,

The California Association of HERS Rater

Last Updated on Thursday, 08 December 2011 06:47
 
From 2009
Written by John Richau   
Tuesday, 29 November 2011 18:09


Last Updated on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 18:44
 
Open Forum Meeting CalCERTS Nov 21. 2011 Rancho Cordova (East Sacramento)
Written by John Richau   
Tuesday, 22 November 2011 04:53

Open-Forum-Sac

From Brian Treece via LinkedIn

Open Forum Meeting CalCERTS Nov 21. 2011 Rancho Cordova (East Sacramento)

Mindy Craig of Blue Point Planning & MIG, chaired a discussion with 27 HERS Raters, as well as CalCERTS employees Michael Bachand, President; Russ King, PE, VP Technical Services; Mark Weiss, Trainer & QA Inspector; Kevin Beck, Buidling Performance Contractor Trainer. The discussion was filmed and Mindy will provide a link to the topics and details discussed.

1) ENFORCEMENT! The #1 issue was the need for town/city builidng officials as well as the CEC to ENFORCE their own energy code. CalCERTS is relying on HERS raters to educate the building officials on an informal basis. Officials will not go to a free seminar unless they are paid to. CalCERTS is going to a training meeting with Oakland building officials early next year because the inspectors agreed to. An idea was floated for the CEC to track serial numbers of HVAC units and impose heavy fines on distributors if units are sold to unlicenced mechanical contractors or if those contractors do not pull a permit or HERS rating.

2) CHANGES Russ King stated that there will be 20 hours of continuiing education requirement in 2012 to maintain your certification. This must be completed by Dec 31, 2012. The CEC is currently seeking public comment on the 2013 Title 24 Energy Code. There have only been 2 HERS raters that have gone to these meetings. They NEED TO HEAR FROM HERS RATERS! The HVAC Contractors and manufacturers certainly have been attending. The CEC needs your voice! Major changes can be made now if you speak up. As time goes on in the process, only smaller and smaller details can be made. Here are some already on the table: i) Duct testing required for all climate zones. ii) An electronic device "plug" being attached by manufacturer to AC condensors sold in CA, so that HERS testing of refrigerant charge does not require opening up condensor, put attaching gages to this electronic "plug" This will reduce the need for the EPA training requirement iii) Whole house HERSII raters MUST have solar training to be certified iv) CEC may strike down Flow Hood testing and require flow grid or pressure plenum matching.. HERS RATERS NEED TO SPEAK UP ON THIS!

3) OTHER ISSUES Raters need feedback, both good and bad, when they undergo QA inspection regardless of whether or not they pass or fail. Raters can learn from their weekness even if they pass! A instantaneous technical help line for Raters in the field when they need answers NOW! A technical blog, so that raters can flip through tough technical issues to find answers, when they can get no one on the phone to help them. Reduce the need to type twice the information onf the 6R and 4R -- maybe a transfer data button? The need for training and feedback for how to use the CalCERTS registry. The issue needs to be solved in cold weather, when escrow is tied to the occupancy permit, which will not be issued until a MECH 24 is obtained and not a MECH 26. Building officials need to be educated by CEC and CalCERTS about releasing the permit on a MECH 26!

4) QUALITY ASSURANCE New contract language is being developed to hold the employer of the rater (partially/fully?) liable for mistakes made by the rater. Those agreements will have to be signed to hold rater certification.

5) GOING FORWARD New State law being dabated to require whole house HERS ratings of residences going through a real estate transfer (? AB788 ?)

That is about it! Thanks for reading and remember to input your voice into the new 2013 Title 24 code changes throught the CEC!

Brian Treece

Last Updated on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 18:30
 
Is HERS II Dead?
Written by John Richau   
Friday, 11 November 2011 07:26

From CBPCA...


November 3, 2011

The August 25th memorandum from Panama Bartholomy, Deputy Director of the California Energy Commission’s Efficiency and Renewables Division might lead one to think that HERS II is dead. The memorandum is written on behalf of Energy Upgrade California Steering Committee and announces that the Energy Upgrade California program will not require HERS II ratings for the period 2010 through 2012. Even though Director Bartholomy’s memorandum stresses that the Steering Committee continues to encourage the voluntary use Independent HERS II raters, this is a stunning policy reversal for both the Energy Commission and the Energy Upgrade California Steering Committee.

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 13 November 2011 04:08
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2